Morals vs religion

If you are concerned about questioning your faith, if the thought of that creates an inner fear, then I will let you in on a little secret; there is nothing to fear. Which provides a whole Morals vs religion dimension of reality to the statement in the Gospel of Thomas: And because our culture and linear learning environment actually inhibits the development of the Morals vs religion, it remains atrophied and latently embryonic and immature.

Find out what awaits in the subconscious. Jonathan Haidt and Jesse Graham have studied the differences between liberals and conservativesin this regard.

If you assume particular morals, then look at religious texts, you will end up selecting the text that most matches your own morals. Importantly, those with a religious background are as clueless or incoherent as atheists. The result is that the intuitive spheres of mind of the vast majority of people is dysfunctional with respect to its natural abilities and strengths.

I also acknowledge here and in other sections that cultures are typically the arbiters of justice; they define what is right and wrong, and the people implicitly agree by their obedience to the Morals vs religion. The proper development of the mind to eclipse what can be called organic human limitations, is dependent upon the interaction of the linear and intuitive spheres of mind.

Fear and ignorance will hold us down. We have no rational basis for claims of what morals God considers best. Hitler, Stalin, and all of the other crazies leaders made themselves gods.

They were electing these legislators based on promises of national legislative effort. In the United States, where the conservative right argues that we should turn to religion for moral insights and inspiration, the gap between government and religion is rapidly diminishing.

In his textbook on quantum theory, Bohm offered some interesting speculations on the analogies between quantum processes and thought processes, thus carrying further the celebrated statement made by the astronomer James Jeans two decades earlier: Such a being knows that we can only interpret life subjectively, and that no text will mean the same thing for any two people.

Religion may even be the best form of social control the world has ever invented, but that does not mean it is perfect or that it should stay static. But we have very few of the original texts of our major religions. How do you prove to others that you have the ability to foresee and precognitively detect a event in the physical that is about to transpire?

Which is the absolute fulfillment of the reality in the words: Wherefore seek Him first of all; and if you do not find Him, expect not that you shall learn anything from any other.

Difference Between Morals and Values

This process of undoing the harmful effects of our traditional religious and educational systems which employ rote programming in their attempt to induce a condition of knowing is perhaps put in its proper perspective by Thomas Jefferson who wrote: The oldest known complete copy of our Gospels is called the Evangelion Da - Mepharresh and in it we find Jesus saying at Luke A railroad worker is standing next to a switch that can turn the trolley onto a side track, killing one person, but allowing the five to survive.

The power of the meme of God for self-sensorship truly amazes me. This is a very limiting expression of what religion is. I see such manipulation to be an inherent evil. So unless you want to go down the philosophical road of Determinism, I suggest we all concede that ethical knowledge is innate whether biological or God-given if you prefer.

The problem is seen in the fact that the linear-rational servant can only look outwardly -- and not only remains totally ignorant of an inner reality that it is blind to -- but it demands that all of mankind ignore and even reject the higher causal reality that can only be sensed and understood through the development of the intuitive centers of mind.

For example, within Buddhismthe intention of the individual and the circumstances play roles in determining whether an action is right or wrong. If religion is a source for light for you it is likely because you want it to be, and you auto-filter out all of the bad stuff associated with it.

Sciencef Science is a study which collects, organizes, and proves or disproves the knowledge that has been collected through analysis. Ingroups and outgroups Some observers hold that individuals apply distinct sets of moral rules to people depending on their membership of an " in-group " the individual and those they believe to be of the same group or an "out-group" people not entitled to be treated according to the same rules.

Which is why Jesus taught that a man who even looks upon a woman other than his wife with lust, has already committed adultery -- and no valid marriage can even exist in an adulterous relationship.Affidavit Of Allan Cronshaw The Question?

What Does Seatbelts Have To Do With The Practice of Religion?

What is the Difference Between Ethics and Morals?

When biblical scholars go on record and state that the modern Church has virtually nothing in common with the original teachings which came to be known as Christianity (see The Religion Of Roman Emperors), the facts that confront. This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book.

The digit and digit formats both work. p. THE PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEM OF GOOD AND EVIL. THE question as to the nature of evil is by far the most important problem for.

Morals of Buddhism - Buddhism consists of several morals throughout the religion that guide the way one should live. The overall goal of Buddhists is to become enlightened. Morality (from Latin: mōrālis, lit. 'manner, character, proper behavior') is the differentiation of intentions, decisions and actions between those that are distinguished as proper and those that are improper.

Morality can be a body of standards or principles derived from a code of conduct from a particular philosophy, religion or culture, or it can derive from.

Violence, crime, ignorance, moral ineptitude and sexual abuse: The long list of religious atrocities should be enough for us to abandon our respect for religion.

Morals vs religion
Rated 3/5 based on 28 review